Topic “DeFi”
-
How I understand "MEV"?
MEV exists because blockspace is scarce and valuable. This might sound abstract, but it's actually quite intuitive once you think about it the right way. Here, in a simplified version, is my mental model for thinking about MEV. continue reading
-
MEV law after Avi Eisenberg's (partial) victory
Avraham Eisenberg—previously found guilty of wire fraud and market manipulation of Mango Markets by a jury—was just acquitted on wire fraud charges. Also, while the judge confirmed Eisenberg engaged in illegal market manipulation, this conviction was vacated for being brought in a wrong jurisdiction (New York instead of Puerto Rico). This decision provides us rare insight into how U.S. courts may approach MEV-related prosecutions. My co-authors and I argued in "Blockchain Transaction Ordering as Market Manipulation" that applying traditional finance assumptions to crypto is a risky business and that intuitions about fairness do not automatically carry over. We also argued that certain forms of MEV—particularly sandwiching—might constitute market manipulation under existing law. Here, I comment on the nuances that the Eisenberg decision introduces for legal analysis of MEV. continue reading
-
DEX self-regulation
While self-regulation for centralized crypto exchanges is a familiar idea, extending this to decentralized exchanges (DEXs) presents unique hurdles. Yuliya Guseva's recent paper proposes a way forward: a central Self-Regulatory Organization (OSRO) that initially focuses on high-level standards and whitelisting compliant platforms, rather than immediate heavy regulation. This approach aims to nudge the fast-evolving DEX space towards greater safety and coordination, but its success likely hinges on a growing market demand for trustworthiness within the crypto world. continue reading
-
Good/bad MEV: arbitrage
First text in my series on "good/bad" MEV—focusing on arbitrage trades. Arbitrage in decentralized finance represents one of the most competitive and fundamental forms of MEV realization. This strategy tends to be viewed as bening, especially in comparison with sandwiching. However, in some contexts, even arbitrage may be problematic. continue reading
- MEV (not only) for lawyers (video)
-
The Legal Risks of Automated Transaction Copying in Crypto Markets
Public blockchains like Ethereum enable transparency but also create opportunities for automated bots to exploit pending transactions. This post examines the legal risks of such strategies, including copying or facilitating illicit trades, as seen in the Inverse Finance hack. While liability under U.S. securities law is often limited, exceptions arise in cases of recklessness or aiding criminal activity, highlighting the need for regulatory scrutiny and potential safeguards. continue reading
-
Law and regulation vs MEV extraction
MEV extraction raises complex legal and regulatory challenges, particularly around market abuse and social welfare impacts. This post explores key questions about individual harm, market efficiency, and the potential for technical or legal solutions to address these issues while preserving the benefits of decentralized blockchains. continue reading